Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Rigney Law LLC Motto
  • Free Consultation

Grant County Judge Orders Police To Return Land Rover At Center Of Civil Forfeiture Case

FB-Civil-Forfeiture.jpg

Judge Ruled Police Violated the Eighth Amendment When They Seized a Land Rover During a Drug Bust – Civil Forfeiture

WTIU/WFIU News, Steve Burns reports: Judge Jeffrey D. Todd ruled police violated the Eighth Amendment when officers seized Tyson Timbs’ $35,000 Land Rover during a drug bust in May of 2013. The Eighth Amendment bars excessive bail and excessive fines.

Timbs pleaded guilty to selling $400 worth of heroin from his Land Rover. He served a year of house arrest and paid $1,200 in court costs.

However, lawyers from the state of Indiana filed a “Civil Forfeiture” lawsuit to take the title to Timbs’ Land Rover. Timbs purchased his vehicle with part of a $70,000 life insurance policy left to him from his dad.

“The State sought forfeiture of his only asset; an asset he purchased using life insurance proceeds rather than drug money, and a tool essential to maintaining employment, obtaining treatment, and reducing the likelihood that he would ever again commit another criminal offense,” Judge Todd said in court documents issued Monday.

Although a trial court ruled in 2015 the state should return Timbs’ vehicle, the Indiana State Supreme Court ruled state and local authorities are not bound by the Eighth Amendment.

Timbs’ appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court which ordered the Indiana Supreme Court to re-hear the case. The state’s high court sent Timb’s case back to Judge Todd’s courtroom last October.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Help Yourself By Contacting Our Office Today. The Consultation Is Free And Easy To Schedule.

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation